Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern

Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Rela@vism 30.0%

Scien@sm and Arguments 30.0%

Personal Perspec@ve and Worldview 30.0%

Organiza@on, Effec@veness, and Format 10.0%

Mechanics of Wri@ng (includes spelling, punctua@on, grammar, language use) 5.0%

Documenta@on of Sources (cita@ons, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0%

Total Weightage 100%

1

 

 

Assignment Title Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Unsa@sfactory (0.00%)

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is incomplete or insufficient.

Explana@on of scien@sm or the explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are inaccurate. Details are not supported.

Worldview ques@ons are not fully answered.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communica@on of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construc@on is used.

Sources are not documented.

2

 

 

Total Points 100.0

Less Than Sa@sfactory (65.00%)

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is unclear. Explana@on is not supported by topic study materials.

Descrip@on of scien@sm is accurate. Explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are unclear. Details are not clearly supported by topic study materials.

Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered but is lacking a personal connec@on or clarity.

Frequent and repe@@ve mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Documenta@on of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous forma]ng errors.

3

 

 

Sa@sfactory (75.00%)

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is clear. Explana@on is not supported by topic study materials.

Explana@on of scien@sm is clear. Explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are clear. Details are supported by topic study materials.

Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered with personal connec@on.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distrac@ng to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some forma]ng errors may be present.

4

 

 

Good (85.00%)

Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of postmodern rela@vism is clear and detailed. Explana@on is supported by topic study materials.

Explana@on of scien@sm is clear and accurate. Explana@ons of two main arguments against scien@sm are clear. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered clearly and with personal connec@on.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effec@ve sentence structures and figures of speech.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style

"Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now