Analyze what might have transpired if Annie did not have a nursing background.
Appreciably, having a good background and knowledge regarding plays a pivotal role in enhancing the health-outcomes of the patients. A critical examination of the current case illustrates that if Annie did not have a nursing background, she would not comprehend the essence of taking the beta blocker daily to address the problem of rapid heart rate. As well, she would neither have contacted the APRN to continually provide her with more supply regarding her medication (Milstead & Short, 2014). The implication here is that the health condition of Annie would have significantly deteriorated. It is by having a stable nursing background that Annie created a plan for an annual wellness visit. The annual might have played a significant role in the augmentation of her health outcomes. In regards to this, it is presumed that if she did not have a good background on nursing, she would not have understood the importance of making frequent contacts with the APRN to enhance her health condition. Observably, Annie was able to decide the use of therapy due to the actuality that she knew reading lab tests. Also, she did not depend on the physical symptoms to start treatment (Milstead & Short, 2014). Therefore, it is portended that her health condition regarding urinary tract infection (UTI).
List the breakdowns in communication that occurred and the potential ramifications
A critical analysis of the scenario indicates that failure in communication occurred in two core ways. In the first place, it is observed that Annie had never conversed with any of the healthcare providers within the office of the APRN after her initial visit (Milstead & Short, 2014). As a result, it is possible that the APRN would not be able to check on the performance of her health condition. About this, it is recommended that either the APRN or Annie would have made the initiative of calling since this had the potentiality of augmenting the health outcomes (Kern & Kaushal, 2013). The second breakdown is noted in the case where Annie attempts to ignore the call from the pharmacy but later decides to pick it. The potential ramification at this point is that Annie should make the effort of taking calls from the healthcare providers to enable her to have a good care plan (Kern & Kaushal, 2013).
Did the advance practice nurse’s office fulfill a meaningful use stage 2 requirements of providing secure electronic communication between the patient and healthcare provider?
A meaningful deployment of stage 2 requirements regarding the provision of electronic communication between the invalid and the healthcare should take into consideration convalescent electronic access measurement (Dolin, 2013). The measure necessitates that healthcare professionals offer the invalids with an electronic copy that shows their health information. A close evaluation of the scenario provided indicates that the APRN met this specification since she instructed Anne to reach her health records contained in the current electronic document such that she would get immediate messages and findings. Another requirement regarding reasonable employment is that professionals that are eligible are to deploy the secure electronic messaging approach in communicating with invalids on relevant and appropriate health data (Dolin, 2013). The electronic information, in this case, can be an email or any invalid online portal. A close assessment of this scenario provides that the condition was met in the sense that the APRN used emails to communicate with Annie regarding her health conditions. The electronic and secure messaging was integral in the promotion of care, addressing the concerns and questions of the patient, and enhancing the management of Annie’s condition (Dolin, 2013).